Anocloud
Let’s Talk

A policy document doesn’t stop a breach. A line of configuration does.

We run the same loop for every standard you have to meet: the rule, a control with a named owner and a deadline, the code that enforces it, and evidence generated automatically.

Pillar 05Where policy becomes plumbing
One programme, both regimes

Indian firms selling into America carry DPDP by law and SOC 2 or HIPAA by customer demand, with data crossing a border. We run both from a single control set — once, not twice.

What we lead with
  • The rule — e.g. DPDP Act §8(7), erase personal data when consent is withdrawn
  • The control — a named owner, a deadline and a test; erasure completes everywhere in 72 hours
  • The code — on consent.withdrawn, purge warehouse, backups, caches and vector store
  • The evidence — a dated, signed record for every request, ready for the auditor
Typical stack
DPDP ActISO/IEC 27001SOC 2HIPAAISO/IEC 42001
72hStandard for erasure completing across every system
5Standards run on one control set: DPDP, ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 42001
1Control set covering both Indian and US regimes
Questions

What clients ask us first.

The new AI management standard. Few firms in India offer it yet; we build against it now because agent programmes will be measured on it shortly.
At the rule. They hand you a policy that names an obligation and leave the enforcement, the test and the evidence to you. The last three steps are the work.
No — that is the point. One control set satisfies both, so you collect evidence once rather than twice.
Next step

Talk to us about compliance as code.

Tell us what you are running today and what has to be true in ninety days.